The article compares and contrasts the roles and realisations of evaluative language, as well as the preference for certain types of evaluation in English and Romanian headlines. The analysis which is carried out in order to identify and interpret evaluative language in headlines uses theory and instruments from media linguistics, corpus linguistics and stylistics. The media linguistic layer of analysis foregrounds the use of reporting words in headlines and the leads as a means of conveying the journalists’ voices and other voices embedded in the fabric of the headline. The stylistic analysis exploits the resources of language: the evaluative force of the reporting verbs as well as the variation of expressing reporting. The datasets used for this analysis consists of two corpora: one in English and another one in Romanian, the English corpus comprises 805 headlines, while the Romanian one 800 headlines. The corpora are created from two large corpora and are processed by hand. The comparison of the two corpora captures the frequency, role, distribution of the reporting expressions and the prevailing types of reporting, linguistic reporting and mental reporting.

Bednarek, M. (2006). Sobbing, screaming and shouting? Reporting expressions in the British press In C. Houswitschka, G. Knappe, & A. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings Anglistentag 2005 Bamberg (pp. 561-572). Trier: WVT: 561-572.

Bednarek, M. (2009). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. Bloomsbury Publishing plc.

Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2017). The discourse of news values. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bednarek, M., & Carr, G. (2021). Computer-assisted digital text analysis for journalism and communications research: Introducing corpus linguistic techniques that do not require programming. Media International Australia, 181(1), 131–151. doi: https://doi.org/10.177/132987X20947124 

Chovanec, J. (2003). The uses of the present tense in headlines. In Theory and practice in English studies, Volume 1: Proceedings from the Seventh Conference of English, American and Canadian Studies (Linguistics and Methodology), Brno 2003 (pp. 83–92). Masaryk University. www.phil.muni.cz/angl/thepes/thepes_01_00.pdf

Chovanec, J. (2014). Pragmatics of tense and time in news: From canonical headlines to online news texts (Vol. 253). John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.253

Fludernik, M. (2003). Chronology, time, tense and experientiality in narrative. Language and Literature, 12(2), 117-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947003012002295

Herțeg, M-C. (2021a). The stylistics and semantics of the verb. A case study: The indicative mood. A cross-linguistic approach. Alba Iulia: Editura Aeternitas.

Herțeg, M.-C. (2021b). A corpus-based approach to conceptual metaphors in English and Romanian headlines. A contrastive analysis. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 14(2), 57-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2021.14.2.4

Herteg, M-C. (2024). News values and evaluative language in English and Romanian headlines. A corpus-based analysis. Annales Universitatis Apulensis. Series Philologica, 25(2), 319-334.

Neagu, M.-I. (2017). Conceptualizing emotions. Fear, love, anger, and the Holocaust. In D. Tomescu, & M.-I. Neagu (Eds.), Information and persuasion studies in linguistics, literature, culture and discourse analysis (pp.115-136). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1980). A Grammar of Contemporary English. Singapore: Longman.

Verdonk, P. (2002). Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.