The aim of this paper is to analyse the metaphorical utterances used in the advertising messages in Three Billboards outside Ebbing, Missouri, 2017. The framework of analysis is provided by Forceville (1996), who applied the relevance theory to metaphors used in advertising.

The three billboards feature simple messages in black capital letters against a crimson red background, without any pictures, which however trigger thoughts and events not necessarily anticipated or expected by the sender. The journey of the intended message to the desired action meant by the communicator is long and twisted, and makes the tragi-comedy enthralling, despite its lack of verisimilitude.

The POLICE ARE GUARDIANS metaphor is challenged (hence the question mark in the message printed on the third billboard) throughout the movie and the fantasy-like ending offers no redemption at all (ex-officer Dixon is no longer lawfully entitled to pursue the alleged culprit). The police are ultimately and undeniably useless, trust is shattered, traditional institutions are contested, as they can no longer provide justice. Controversially enough, there is a backward trajectory for Dixon, who almost achieves redemption at the end of the movie, in joining forces with Frances, in order to fight a righteous cause.

Brown, B. (2011). Cinematography: Theory and Practice. Image making for cinematographers and directors, 2nd ed. Oxford: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Charteris-Black, J. (2016). Fire Metaphors: Discourses of Awe and Authority. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bosch, P. (1985). Context dependence and metaphor. In W. Paprotté, & R. Dirven (Eds), The Ubiquity of Metaphor: Metaphor in Language and Thought, (pp. 141–176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London and New York: Routledge.

Forceville, Ch. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Ch. Forceville, & E. Urios Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor, (pp. 19-42). Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (second, revised and expanded edition) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Leech, G.N. (1966). English in Advertising: A Linguistic Study of Advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.

McGlone, M.S. (1996). Conceptual metaphors and figurative language interpretation: Food for thought?. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 544–565. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0029

McQuarrie, E.F., & Phillips, B.J. (2005). Indirect Persuasion in Advertising: How Consumers Process Metaphors Presented in Pictures and Words. Journal of Advertising, 34(2), 7–20. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2005.10639188

Phillips, B.J. & McQuarrie, E.F (2009). Impact of Advertising Metaphor on Consumer Belief: Delineating the Contribution of Comparison Versus Deviation Factors. Journal of Advertising, 38, 49-62. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367380104

Pyne, S.J. (2001). Fire: A Brief History. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

Ramsey, C., & Robinson, L. (2015). Final report. The President’s task force on 21st century policing. Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. Retrieved 19 December 2018, from https://cops.usdoj.gov/RIC/Publications/cops-p311-pub.pdf

Ricoeur, P. (1977). The Rule of Metaphor: Multi-disciplinary Studies of the Creation of Meaning in Language (trans. R. Czerny et al.). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Oxford: Blackwell.

Ward, J., & Gaidis, W. (1990). Metaphor in promotional communication: A review of Research on metaphor comprehension and quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 17(1), 636-642.

Vervaeke, J., & Kennedy, J.M. (2004). Conceptual metaphor and abstract thought. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(3), 213–231. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1903_3