This study challenges the prevailing assumption that greater institutional support invariably enhances teacher technological self-efficacy by testing for non-linear relationships in Vietnamese university EFL contexts. Using sequential mixed methods, 245 EFL teachers from eight universities completed the Technology Integration Self-Efficacy Scale, followed by semi-structured interviews with 18 participants. Polynomial regression revealed a significant inverted U-relationship between institutional support and self-efficacy (quadratic term β = −.23, p < .01), with moderate-resource institutions demonstrating highest teacher confidence (M = 4.15) compared to both high-resource (M = 3.76) and limited-resource contexts (M = 3.56). Thematic analysis identified three mechanisms explaining this pattern: support dependency in high-resource settings undermining autonomous confidence, experiential mastery blockage when extensive assistance eliminates productive struggle, and cultural amplification through face-saving dynamics intensifying performance anxiety. These findings are consistent with a boundary condition on self-efficacy theory, indicating that optimal rather than maximal support is associated with stronger confidence development, a pattern that calls resource-maximisation policies in educational technology implementation into question. The study demonstrates that moderate institutional support preserves productive challenges necessary for authentic mastery experiences while avoiding both resource deprivation and dependency-inducing excess.

Adhikari, J., Mathrani, A., & Scogings, C. (2017). A longitudinal journey with BYOD classrooms: Issues of access, capability and outcome divides. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v21i0.1693

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

An, Y., Li, L., & Wei, X. (2021). What influences teachers’ self-efficacy in East Asia? Evidence from the 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 49(5), Article e10359. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.10359

Asanov, A. (2025). Examining EFL teachers’ assessment literacy: Factors of influence at Westminster International University in Tashkent. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 18(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2025.18.1.1

Bandura, A. (2005). The evolution of social cognitive theory. In K. G. Smith & M. A. Hitt (Eds.), Great minds in management: The process of theory development (pp. 9–35). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0002

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Chroqui, R., & Ouahidi, L. M. (2025). EMI professors’ readiness: A systematic literature review. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 18(1), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2025.18.1.3

Dörnyei, Z., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2022). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Taylor & Francis.

Fang, G., Li, X., Chan, P. W. K., & Kalogeropoulos, P. (2024). A multilevel investigation into teacher-supported student use of technology in East Asian classroom: Examining teacher and school characteristics. Computers & Education, 218, Article 105092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105092

Gomez, F. C., Trespalacios, J., Hsu, Y., & Yang, D. (2021). Exploring teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy through the 2017 ISTE standards. TechTrends, 66(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00639-z

Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M. (2024). Technology-enhanced language learning in English language education: Performance analysis, core publications, and emerging trends. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2346044

Ho, N. T. T., Abdullah, M. R. T. L., Idrus, H. B., Sivapalan, S., Pham, H., Dinh, V., Pham, H. K., & Nguyen, L. T. M. (2023). Acceptance toward Coursera MOOCs blended learning: A mixed methods view of Vietnamese higher education stakeholders. SAGE Open, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231197997

Hoang, N. H. (2024). Exploring digital competence among Vietnamese EFL preservice teachers: The role of ICT self-efficacy, collegial collaboration, and infrastructural support. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2024.2407327

Kamalov, F., Calonge, D. S., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451–12466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

Kandiero, A. (2021). Adoption of open education resources at a higher education institution using explanatory sequential mixed methods research design. In Advances in knowledge acquisition, transfer, and management (pp. 575–601). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8844-4.ch027

Kieu, T. K., Singer, J., & Gannon, T. J. (2016). Education for sustainable development in Vietnam: Lessons learned from teacher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(6), 853–874. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-05-2015-0098

Ko, Y., & Shin, W. S. (2023). Exploring teachers’ intention to integrate technology: A comparison between online- and AR/VR-based instruction. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 32(4), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2023.2237037

Koleini, N., Boroughani, T., Eslami, Z. R., & Xodabande, I. (2024). Exploring the impacts of mobile-assisted learning on university students’ technical vocabulary knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, Article 100344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100344

Kuddus, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in language learning: Practices and prospects. In Advanced analytics and deep learning models (pp. 1–17). Scrivener Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119792437.ch1

Le, T. T. T. (2024). Digitalisation of higher education in Vietnam. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 16(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v16i2.5710

Leal Filho, W., Salvia, A. L., Abubakar, I. R., Mifsud, M., Azadi, H., Sharifi, A., LeVasseur, T., Luetz, J. M., Velazquez, L., Singh, P., Pretorius, R., Akib, N. A. M., Savelyeva, T., Brandli, L., Muthu, N., & Lombardi, P. (2022). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on routines of higher education institutions: A global perspective. Sustainability, 14(21), 14105–14124. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114105

Marzuki, M., Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, D., & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organisation of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. SAGE.

Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480

Mohamed, A. M. (2023). Investigating the benefits of multimodal project-based learning in teaching English to international students. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 2(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.31949/ijeir.v2i2.5085

Mossafaie, M., Alibakhshi, G., & Tabrizi, H. H. (2024). Iranian EFL teachers’ self-efficacy: Structural equation modeling of the consequences. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00264-2

Mpuangnan, K. N. (2024). Teacher preparedness and professional development needs for successful technology integration in teacher education. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2024.2408837

Nguyen, H. H. (2024). Investigating Vietnamese tertiary EFL teachers’ levels of information and communication technology integration through the lens of the SAMR model. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5225

Nurmala, I., Irianto, S., Franchisca, S., Amsa, H., & Susanti, R. (2023). Technology-enhanced language learning: A meta-analysis study on English language teaching tools. Journal on Education, 6(1), 2188–2195. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i1.3221

Rusu, D., & Literat, R. (2023). The influence of online education on the acquisition of 21st century skills. Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE, 16(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2023.16.1.8

Saienko, N., Lavrysh, Y., & Lukianenko, V. (2020). The impact of educational technologies on university teachers’ self-efficacy. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.19

Şimşek, Ö., & Sarsar, F. (2019). Investigation of the self-efficacy of the teachers in technological pedagogical content knowledge and their use of information and communication technologies. World Journal of Education, 9(1), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v9n1p196

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2023). Collective teacher culture and school goal structure: Associations with teacher self-efficacy and engagement. Social Psychology of Education, 26(4), 945–969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09778-y

Thompson, C., Jalali, M., & Hills, P. J. (2023). Exploring the carry-over of top-down attentional settings in dynamic conditions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(11), 2650–2663. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218231155018

Tran, N., Le, T., Nguyen, L., Hoang, L., & Nguyen, T. (2020). Factors influencing technology adoption in Vietnam’s educational system. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.n10.347

Truong, T. D., Hallinger, P., & Sanga, K. (2016). Confucian values and school leadership in Vietnam. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(1), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143215607877

Vedder-Weiss, D., Segal, A., & Lefstein, A. (2019). Teacher face-work in discussions of video-recorded classroom practice: Constraining or catalysing opportunities to learn? Journal of Teacher Education, 70(5), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487119841895

Wang, C., & Hu, X. (2024). Exploring the influential factors of online professional learning completion of college teachers from the Global South in an international training program. The Internet and Higher Education, 64, Article 100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100963

Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955

Yan, R., Liu, B., & Zhang, L. J. (2024). Effects of pedagogical intervention on Chinese EFL learners’ use of motivational regulation strategies and oral English proficiency improvement. Heliyon, 10(19), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38355

Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020). Relationship between pre-service mathematics teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and instructional practices in China. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x

Zeng, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2022). The relationship between teachers’ information technology integration self-efficacy and TPACK: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1091017