"Active listening" as a key competence in intercultural communication education – an academic classroom example with conceptual and theoretical embedding

Authors
Sylke Meyerhuber - University of Bremen, Germany
Abstract

Awareness of social tolerance and intercultural bridge-building can be raised by communication training that focuses on active listening competences. In humanistic psychology, ‘Active Listening’ is understood as a technical term developed by C. R. Rogers (1942, 1951, 1961, 2004) that describes a specific form of attentiveness helpful in different types of professional conversations. This attitude and technique promote highly attentive listeners who are advised to mirror back what has been understood without adding their own viewpoints. When fully realised and appropriately applied, this attitude is much more effective than might be expected. Reasons are reflected on the basis of ‘the dialectic of social recognition’ by A. Honneth (1990, 1992). ‘Active Listening’ opens a royal road to real interest in the counterpart and a deeper understanding of the self and the other, in addition to trust building and fresh insights for both parties during a communicative event. As a course of action, it is successfully applied by therapists, counsellors, leadership personnel, in social and pastoral work, etc. In this paper, the author introduces the cornerstones of the theory behind this communication method and explains how to conduct an exercise of ‘Active Listening’ for students in university seminars. It concludes with a proposal on how to position this approach in the discourse of intercultural communication education, underpinned by the studies in applied linguistics of A. Holliday (2013, 2016, 2018), and taking into consideration the effects of ‘Active Listening’. It becomes evident that in professional and intercultural communication ‘Active Listening’ can be valuable and describes how it can be conveyed.

Keywords
Active listening in controlled dialogue; Awareness training; Personal growth; Tertiary didactic; Intercultural communication education.
References

Absolventa (2017). Aktives Zuhören: So geht’s. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from https://www.absolventa.de/karriereguide/rhetorik/aktives-zuhoeren

 

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

 

Antons, K. (1996). Praxis der Gruppendynamik. Übungen und Techniken (6th ed.). Göttingen: Hogrefe. (Original work published in 1973).

 

Beaven, A. & Borghetti, C. (2015). Intercultural education resources for Erasmus students and their teachers. Koper: University of Primorska, Annales University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2015.992202

 

Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551

 

Boesch, E. E. (1996). Das Fremde und das Eigene. In A. Thomas (Ed.), Psychologie interkulturellen Handeln (pp. 87–105). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

 

Cohn, R. C. (1975). Von der Psychoanalyse zur themenzentierten Interaktion. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

 

Dervin, F. (2016). Interculturality in education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07256860120094000

 

Egle, G. (2015). Umschreibendes Zuhören. Teachsam Psychologie. Retrieved July 11, 2018, from: http://www.teachsam.de/psy/psy_kom/psy_kom_2_2_3_3.htm

 

Fischer, G., & Riedesser, P. (2009). Lehrbuch der Psychotraumatologie (4th ed.). München: Reinhardt UTB.

 

Freud, S. (1959). Freud’s psycho-analytic procedure. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 7) (pp. 249–270). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published in 1904).

 

Glasl, F. (1994). KonfliktmanagementEin Handbuch für Führungskräfte und Berater (4th ed.). Bern: Haupt.

 

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. (Vol. 1). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

 

Hall, S. (1996). The west and the rest. Discourse and power. In S. Hall, D. Held, D. Hubert & K. Thompson (Eds.), Modernity: An introduction to modern societies (pp. 184–228). Oxford: Blackwell.

 

Hecker, W. (2017). The influence of humanistic psychology on TCI. In M. Schneider-Landolf, J. Spielmann & W. Zitterbart (Eds.), Handbook of theme-centered interaction (TCI) (pp. 35–39). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

 

Holliday, A.R. (2013). Understanding intercultural communicationNegotiating a grammar of culture. London: Routledge.

 

Holliday, A.R. (2016). Cultural travel and cultural prejudice. In M. B. Aquino, & S. Frota (Eds.), Identities: representation and practices (pp. 25–44). Lisbon: Celga Iltec, University of Coimbra.

 

Holliday, A.R. (2018). Designing a course in intercultural education. Intercultural Communication Education1(1), 4–11. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.29140/ice.v1n1.24

 

Honneth, A. (1990). Integrität und Mißachtung. Grundmotive einer Moral der Anerkennung. Merkur 4412(501), 1043–1054.

 

Honneth, A. (1992). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

 

Kuebel, M.A. (Ed.). (2002). Living learning. A reader in theme-centered interaction. Delhi: Media House.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2001). Transparenz in Arbeitsorganisationen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2004). Beratung mit Wurzeln in der Qualitativen Sozialforschung? Reflexion über das Verhältnis von methodologisch-qualitativem Grundverständnis und der eigenen Haltung in organisationsbezogener Beratungspraxis. In B. Griese, H. R. Griesehop & M. Schiebel (Eds.), Perspektiven qualitativer Sozialforschung (INBL 14) (pp. 114–131). Bremen: Universitätsbuchhandlung.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2013). Führungskräfte stärken. In G. Becke, M. Behrens, P. Bleses, S. Meyerhuber, & S. Schmidt (Eds.), Organisationale AchtsamkeitVeränderungen nachhaltig gestalten (pp. 157–184). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2014). Trust and time in reorganisations and the role of middle managers. In G. Becke (Ed.), Mindful change in times of permanent reorganisationOrganizational, Institutional and Sustainability Perspectives (pp. 147–166). London, New York: Springer.

 

Meyerhuber, S., Reiser, H., & Scharer, M. (Eds.). (2019). Theme-Centered Interaction in higher education. A didactic approach for sustainable and living learning. London, New York: Springer.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2019a). Theme-Centered Interaction for educating future leaders applied social psychology for teaching academics to act socially sustainably in organisations. In S. Meyerhuber, H. Reiser, & M. Scharer (Eds.), Theme-Centered Interaction in higher education. A didactic approach for sustainable and living learning (pp. 3–56) London, New York: Springer.

 

Meyerhuber, S. (2019b). Theme-Centered Interaction in personnel development schemes in academia: good reasons and practise examples . In S. Meyerhuber, H. Reiser & M. Scharer (Eds.), Theme-Centered Interaction in higher educationA didactic approach for sustainable and living learning (pp. 281–308) London, New York: Springer.

 

Neuberger, O. (2002). Führen und führen lassen. (6th ed., completely revised and extended) (pp. 452–482). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.

 

Rogers, C.R. (1942). Counseling and psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

 

Rogers, C.R. (1951). Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

 

Rogers, C.R. (1961). On becoming a personA therapist’s view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

 

Rogers, C.R. (2004). Die nicht-direktive Beratung. (Americ. orig. 1942; German orig. 1972, 11th ed.). Frankfurt/M.: Fischer.

 

Rosa, H. (1996). Identität und kulturelle Praxis. Politische Philosphie nach Charles Taylor. Frankfurt/M.: Campus.

 

Ryschka, J., Demmerle, C., Solga, M., Seibel, F., Schmidt, F., & Spies, B. (2008). Verstehen Sie die Menschen? Arbeitsblatt zum Aktiven Zuhören. Net/t)works! Vertiefung zum Juni-Kalenderblatt. Mainz: Verlag Dr. J. Ryschka. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from: https://www.ryschka.de/website/resources/documents/sonstiges/net(t)-works-arbeitsblatt-aktives-zuhoeren.pdf

 

Schneider-Landolf, M., Spielmann, J., & Zitterbart, W. (Eds.). (2017). Handbook of Theme-Centered Interaction (TCI). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

 

Schulz von Thun, F. (1981). Miteinander Reden 1. (53. Aufl. 2016). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

 

Schulz von Thun, F. (1989). Miteinander Reden 2. (35. Aufl. 2016). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

 

Schulz von Thun, F. (1998). Miteinander Reden 3. (25. Aufl. 2016). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

 

Schulz von Thun, F. (2007). Miteinander Reden 4. (7. Aufl. 2016). Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

 

Sejdini, Z, Kraml, M., & Scharer, M. (2017). Mensch werden. Grundlagen einer interreligiösen Religionspädagogik und -didaktik aus muslimisch-christlicher Perspektive. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

 

Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. In The Malaise of Modernity. Toronto: House of Anansi Press.

 

Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and ‘the politics of recognition’. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition (pp. 25–74). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

 

Trainsform (2008). Gruppenübung ‘Kontrollierter Dialog‘. Retrieved July 10, 2018, from http://kiessling-sonntag.de/asset/media/trainsform-KontrollierterDialogGruppe.pdf